What flaws can you identify from Greg Craven's reasoning, in this video- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zORv8wwiadQ?
The video showed an easy to understand version of risk management using grid to sketch out possible scenarios based on: a) whether we choose to take action or not, and b) whether global warming turns out to be a threat or not. Using the grid, Craven concluded that taking action to combat climate change was the better choice, given the relative risks.
In my opinion Craven is correct with his conclusion and his reasoning, but, at the end of the day the whole topic is quite a bit more complex and which is why people, states or the international community are yet to find a 100% accurate solution for climate change and it is tough to make make a vast majority of the world to adapt to a certain life style! Though, a possible way could be going green for a period of time.
No comments:
Post a Comment